Big Brother at Procter and Gamble Read case 3.1, “Big Brother at Procter and Gamble.” Answer the following questions and submit your answers to the instructor. § Was P & G justified in investigating its own employees in order to find the source of a suspected leak? Do you agree with Artz that a company has a right to protect its secrets? Does this right depend on the kind of information that a company seeks to protect? § If P & G had a right to investigate, is there a limit to the steps that it can take? Suppose P & G had searched only the company’s own telephone records, or confined its search to the home telephone records of P & G employees. Would the company have kept within permissible limits? § Were the rights of Cincinnati-area residents violated by the check of their telephone records? How would you feel if your own telephone records were checked in this way? § Do you agree with Artz’s claim that his actions involved mistakes of judgment but were not “an issue of ethics?”