Please to write this critique in line with framework(questions) for critically evaluating research. Please can not to be changed any questions.Answer on every questions. What they are qualifications?, Are their current posts mentioned?, Is they professional and educational background relevant to the particular study?, Was the research founded by an external organisation?, If yes,was there evidence of vested interest influencing the outcome in anyway? Was the study done and what practice issure were the authors addressing?, Dose the literature review apper to be comprehensive?, Dose it appear that the review include mmost of the major studies?, Dose the review use mainly primary sources or is there an over reliance on secondary sources?, Dose is critically discuss the literature, discussing weaknesses of existing literature and identifying gaps in the literature?, Is the rational/aim clear? Was the research design quantitative or qualitative?, Was this an appropriate approach for the purpose of the research and why? What sort of sample was used?, Was the sample representative of the population?, What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach?, Was the sample appropriate to the research?, In what setting was the research undertaken?, Who were the study subjects and how were selected? How did the researcher collect the data?, Was this an appropriate research tool?, If not what alternative tool/technique could have been used?, Was a pilot study undertaken?, Was the study a replication of an earlier study?, If it was a partial replication, what changes were introduced and why?, How were validity and reliability ensured? How were the data analysed?, If quantitatively,was it an appropriate statistical method? Are all the results discussed?, Are the interpretations/conclusions reached consistent with the results?, Are graphs,tables etc easy to understand?, Are there any inconsistencies? Were the results interpreted in the light of the original study aims?, Were the results discussed in relation to findings of other studies?, Did the researcher identify any areas of weakness?, Making suggestions for further research?