Base the 5 double spaced Pages argument on the following case and use The Richard Falk acts of ecocide to argue the case for the US against the Saddam Hussein regime in 1991. The cat states " acts with the intent to disrupt or destroy in whole or in part a human ecosystem." You could base your argument on the Richard Falk acts to support the US Claims and use the Law of the sea and an act of war to support the Iraqi position. But it must show action from the UN Security Council This is what happened in 1991: On January 22. 1991, in the aftermath of the military action against Iraq, Iraqi soldiers allegedly leaked oil from two tankers into the Persian Gulf. While initial estimates put the amount of oil leaked at 11 million barrels, later figures set the amount of the spill at 1.5 million barrels. Environmentalists claimed that the release of oil curtailed fishing, threatened cormorants and sea turtle nesting areas and poisoned rare mangrove trees. According to Thomas Y. Camby writing in the "National Geographic" the oil slick posed a direct threat to the human population because of its anticipated destructive effects upon the Persion Gulf desalination plants that provide potable water. In February of 1991, Iraqi soldiers set ablaze 732 oil wells that consumed approximately 4,600,000 barrels of oil daily and released 1,900,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide, 20,000 metric tons of sulphur dioxide and 12,000 metric tons of soot. This is a brief and not an essay so the argument must be fortcoming.