Maximum word length: 700 words. Question 1 (200 words) - Pria has a question for you. She hears that you are studying law and wants you to explain some advice that she has been given. Her lawyer has said that the result in her dispute may depend upon the judicial interpretation of a precedent and the applicability of an Ordinance. Pria is confused about the relationship between a precedent and an Ordinance. By using the Control of Exemption Clauses Ordinance OR the Sale of Goods Ordinance, can you help explain the relationship to her? Hints: (to explain how the law on a particular topic can come from more than one source. There is no need to go into detail regarding exemption clauses!) (Especially explain how the colonial heritage of the HKSAR means that some old English cases may still be relevant.) Question 2 (240 words) - Starting with a brief overview of the result in the case of Walton’s Stores(Interstate)Ltd v Maher(1988), explain, in your own words, how the principle of “estoppel” was used by the court to reach its judgment. Hints: (needs you to explain the concept of ‘estoppel’.) (Use Walton’s Stores v Maher, but don’t waste words on the facts of the case.) Question 3 (240 words) - Explain the rule of postal acceptance and how it has been modified by the Electronic Transactions Ordinance. Hints: (needs you to explain the concept of the rule of postal acceptance under common law and then how it has been changed by the Ordinance.) (Find an example that illustrates your understanding of the postal acceptance rule.) (You must comment on how the concept of promissory estoppel was applied in Walton’s case.)