Esther has just moved into a house,having bought the freehold.she has discovered that various items which she saw when she inspected the property,and which she expected still to be there,have been removed. The contract of sale made no mention of these items being able to be removed.The items are (i)fitted carpets in the hall and the living room, (ii)an ornate electric bell formerly attached to a bell push on the front door but the wires to which have been cut and the bell removed (iii)fitted kitchen units (iv)a wooden summer house which formerly stood on a concrete platform at the bottom of the garden.She has also noticed that an apple tree in the adjoining garden has branches overhanging her own garden. She wishes to know whether she can cut the branches and whether she is entitled to keep any apples either taken from the branch or which fall from it. Joe,a friend, visited esther and helped her clear some overgrown plants at the bottom of the garden. He found a valuable watch in the overgrowth. A. You are a trainee in a firm of solicitors consulted by esther. Your principal has asked you to research the relevant law and report to the principal (in 1,000 words) on what are the legal principles regarding (a)Whether esther has a claim against the former owner for the removal of the items. (b) what rights esther has regarding the branches and the apples (c) Which of joe or esther has a better claim to keep the watch Your principal particularly wishes to know whether there are any particular relevant cases on these matters. Your principal will the formulate the advice to be given to esther. SEVENTY PERCENT (B) Explain precisely (in 550-600 words) what was your research strategy and how you carried out the research, giving details of the elctronic searches that you made. Outside the word limit,give a bibliography of all books and databases usedto carry out the research, and give a list of all cases that you consulted (Whether or not actually used in Part A of your answer),with the references. THIRTY PERCENT