1.) In Chapter 11, Wildavsky and Pressman discuss learning and evaluation throughout the implementation process. In this chapter, they say: “Implementation is no longer solely about getting what you once wanted but, instead, it is about what you have since learned to prefer until, of course, you change your mind again. As implementation becomes a moving target, the vocabulary of creation and completion becomes less appropriate than the language of evolution” (Pressman and Wildavsky, 234). This brings up some important limitations on how democratic policy process may be. No matter how much public discourse and deliberation went into a policy during the early phases, administrators (unelected, unappointed officials) may have heavy influence on the ultimate form that policy takes. Can implementation undermine democratic values? Why is democracy discussed more at the beginning stages of the policy process than at the end? Do you think democratic values should be better integrated into the implementation, evaluation, and termination phases? This is a master level policy implementation and democracy class the book is implementation by jeffery pressman and aaron wildavsky please feel free to contact me for more information it is a final exam essay question