criteria for assessment the following six factors will take into account when assessing the work. 1. general presentation including terms of reference; introduction; content; summary; ability to communicate; and command of english. 2. investigation including identifying the problem; recording of facts; summary of current debate; and the way in which difficulties were overcome. 3. relevance of facts and information to the term of reference. 4. adequacy of discussion; consideration and level of analysis, including quantitative data (when necessary). 5. charts, diagrams and other illustrative materials including documents, photographs, slides etc., and their relevance to the topic under discussion and consideration. 6. conclusions and recommendations; adequate conclusion should be made to give an overall summary of the arguments and to answer the question posed. references suggested archbold, j. f. (2006) criminal pleading, evidence and practice. london: sweet and maxwell. baker, c. (1998) human rights act 1998: a practitioner’s guide, london: sweet and maxwell. bailey, s. h. and gunn m. j. (2002) smith and bailey on the modern english legal system, 4th edition, london: sweet and maxwell. bottoms, a.e. and mcclean, j. (1976) defendants in the criminal process, london: routledge. bottom, a. (1995) the philosophy and politics of sentencing, in c. clark and r. morgan (eds) the politics of sentencing reform. oxford: claredon. cavadino, m. and dignan, j. (1997) the penal system: an introduction, 2nd edn, london: sage. cheney, d. et al. (2001) criminal justice and the human rights act 1998, 2nd edition. bristol: jordan’s. clark, d. (2004) ‘bevan and lidstone’s the investigation of crime. a guide to the law of criminal investigation’, 3rd edition, london: butterworths. davies, m., croall, h. and tyrer, j. (1995) criminal justice, harlow: longman. farrar, j. h. and dugdale, a. m. (1990) introduction to legal method, 3rd edition, london: sweet and maxwell. griffith, j. a. g. (1985) the politics of the judiciary 3rd edition, london: fontana. harrison, j. and cragg, s. (2005) police misconduct: legal remedies, 4th edition, london: legal action group. harris, p. (2002) an introduction to law 6th edition, london: butterworths. home office (2005) police and criminal evidence act 1984. codes of practice a-g. london: t.s.o. hm government (1998) the data protection act 1998, hmso: london hucklesby, a. (1993) ‘unnecessary legislative change’, new law journal, 143, 19 february: 233–4, 255. jason-lloyd, l. (1996) the criminal justice and public order act 1994: a basic guide for practitioners, london: frank cass publishers. mcconville, m., sanders, a. and leng, r. (1991) the case for the prosecution, london: routledge. mcconville, m. and bridges, l. (eds) (1994) criminal justice in crisis, aldershot: edward elgar. mccrystal,c.(1995) ‘private lives’, the independent on sunday, 11 june. office of the data protection registrar (1997) our answers, odpr: wilmslow. office of the data protection registrar (1997) the guidelines: the data protection act 1984, odpr: wilmslow pullinger, h. (1985) ‘the criminal justice system viewed as a system’, in d. moxon (ed.) managing criminal justice, london: home office. schwartz, pm and reidenberg, jr (1996) data privacy law, lexis law publishing: charlottesville, va tain, p. (1994) the criminal justice and public order act 1994. a practical guide, london: longman. wadham, j. and mountfield, h. (1999). blackstone’s guide to the human rights act 1998, london: blackstone press. zander, m. (1988) cases and materials on the english legal system, 5th edn, london: weidenfeld and nicolson zander, m. (1999) the law-making process, 5th edition, london: butterworths. websites www.bsi-global.com www.ico.gov.uk www.junkbusters.com www.direct.gov.uk www2.echo.lu/legal/en/dataprot/directiv/directiv.html www.privacy.org/ipc/ www.privacyinternational.org/issues/compliance/