4. A provision in the U.S. Safe Web Act provides Internet service providers (ISPs) with a “safe harbor” (immunity from liability) for supplying information to the FTC concerning possible unfair or deceptive conduct in foreign jurisdictions. Is this provision fair? Why or why not? 5.Critics of the 1998 act claim that it has not been used as Congress originally envisioned and that it has had the unintended consequences of chilling free speech and scientific research. In one case, for example, a Russian scientist was arrested after speaking at a conference in the United States because he had worked on a software program that enabled owners of Adobe e-books to convert the files to PDF format. The scientist, who was not charged with copyright infringement, was ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing, but the incident has prompted a number of foreign scientists to refuse to attend conferences in the United States. In what other ways might the act chill free speech? Is there any way to amend the act to avoid this potential problem? Explain. 6. How might criminal spamming statutes, which are likely to vary among the states, affect legitimate businesspersons who advertise on the Internet? If a business discovers that a spammer is using the business’s name in connection with spam, what recourse does that business have? 7. Should the UCC rules governing auctions apply to items sold on on­line auction sites, such as e-Bay? Why or why not? How can you know whether e-Bay’s auc­tions are “with reserve” or “without reserve”? 8. If there was no Statute of Frauds and a dispute arose concerning an oral agreement, how would the parties substantiate their respective positions? 9. When a contract becomes impossible or impracticable to perform, which remedy would a businessperson prefer—rescission or reforma­tion? Why? 10.What is the difference, if any, between reading a restrictive clause in a shrink-wrap agreement and accessing it through a link as part of a click-on agree­ment? 11. Given that the order involved $2 million worth of jeans, how might Bazak International have avoided the dispute as to whether the e-mail confirmation constituted a signed writing? 12. What is the essential difference between revoking acceptance and bringing a suit for breach of contract? 14.What are the disadvantages of not being able to endorse checks to other parties?