The part of the review should contain at least the following: 1. a brief description of the contents of the book 2. an indication of the level of the book 3. an indication of the kind of public for which it is primarily intended 4.an appraisal of the book supported by arguments or examples. This could include,for example, an opinion as to whether the author has been successful in what he/she aimed to do and whether the book fills a gap in the literature. 5. there are no objections to the inclusion of brief relevant remarks about the sale price of the book under review.Case should be taken that such remarks will be appropriate to the public reached with the review; a book on a subject which is marginal to the interests of a user may may more likely be judged expensive than a book which will be used frequently. Opposing Views The existence of views essentially different from those adhered to by the writer or complier of the book may be indicated,as well as a fundamentally different or opposing view which the reviewer holds to that set out in the publication itself.Such information helps to clarify the position of the book. However, acid terminology in the description of someone else''s view should be avoided. Every attempt should be made to maintain a clear distinction between objective information and the more subjective critical evaluation