The organization of the paper should be structured in reverse order of the Critical Thinking Methodology, as follows: 1. Decision i. What you identified as the most serious aspect of your chosen issue, and why. What solution you found to be the most viable. ii. How each sector might be expected to react to the solution you identified 2. Judgment i. How (through what mechanisms) each of the sectors of the Tri-Sector model influences the issue; ii.What is desired by each of the sectors (i.e., what is the problem, as each sector defines it; and what does each desire as a solution)? iii. Which of the sectors has the most influence at this time, and why? The “why” can be addressed by examining current conditions and recent trends. 3. Understanding and Experience i. These two final sections will be a recapitulation of your reflection papers from weeks 2, 4, and 6, with a focus on your growth in understanding and experiencing aspects of your chosen issue, and through the filters of the Methodology, Tri-Sectors, and Common Good. ii. Identification of key resources regarding the issue, presented in correct APA format. The analysis in parts 1 and 2 will be characterized by: iii. use of the critical thinking methodology iv. explorations of pros and cons of various options, as they related to various forms of the Common Good v. identification and use of lexicon: vocabulary and definitions. The written portion should be 1000-1500 words, and characterized by correct grammar, vocabulary, punctuation and references (APA format). Business writing format (using headings, lists, tables, etc.) is an appropriate way to present this information.