Lawrence Kohlberg theorized that there are six stages of moral development through which a person may pass as they develop from infancy to adulthood. Kohlberg was interested in the way that people arrived at their moral judgment of the following dilemma: A woman is suffering from a rare form of cancer and is near death. The doctors claim that there is only one drug that might possibly save her. However, only one pharmacist, who lived near the woman, made the life-saving drug. The drug was expensive – too expensive for most people to afford and was not covered by most insurance plans. The pharmacist was actually charging nearly ten times what the drug cost to make. The husband of the sick woman tried to borrow the monies needed to pay for the drug, but was not approved for a loan and could not borrow the total amount of money needed to pay for the drug (he was only able to get $1,500, which was half of the total cost). The husband tried bargaining with the pharmacist for the drug, but the pharmacist refused to release the drug without full payment. Desperately trying to save his wife, the husband breaks into the pharmacy and steals the drug. Was the husband wrong to steal the drug? Give an overview of Kohlberg’s six stages of moral development – how do people at different stages of moral development answer this dilemma? Do you think that these six stages of moral development are an accurate way to explain the way that people develop moral reasoning? Explain. Do you believe the husband’s actions were morally and ethically justified? *Do not use a lot of quotes!* The last few papers that were sent to me were copied from papers for other schools and completely failed the similarity score. Please make this an original like you state on your website.