most of the countries, all over the world shaped different systems for instance political, economics and education systems. not only to enclose clear image in the market but also to find proper ways to attract foreign investors to join their market. additionally, that can enhance the possibility of investors or market researchers to have a clear idea about the politics restrictions and economics conditions towards any concerned country. according to the fluctuated economy in the global market, shareholders concern more on how to sustain their corporations. therefore, government are able to control their local market. thus, legislations and restrictions provided possibly the core issue in developing an essential market , it can enhance attractiveness and shape the associated economics. so, type of regime that standard by government can highlight the shape of economy. hence, in most of the countries with democrats political system or autocratic sustainability is a controversial issue not only because of the political system but also economics’ condition. this paper will examine that democratic regime isn’t an essential key element to sustain the market. taking into account china and saudi arabia’s market while both under totalitarianism political dimensions with determined and developed economy. then, will define both regimes in order to evaluate between democrats and totalitarianisms this essay will be structured to argue that sustainability can laid out under different political arrangement emphasising both countries which representing sustainability in today’s economy. finally, it is worthwhile to conclude with a clear image of sustainability under different political regime as this essay argued . thus, that can lead us to improve the essential key element of sustainability that can be under different political structure. p.s need to have strong argument on how different regime can build sustainability in economic taking into account saudi as gulf country rich of resources and achieving growth economy . also resources from good journal and wto references are quite strong ,books such as the gulf challenges and the future by emirates center for strategic studies and research & amp; economic development in saudi arabia rodney wilson as well as global business today by mcgrow-hill such books i recommend and what you can get more is better to be maintained more than 25 references . in addition, i would like to have footnotes and the bibliography prefer it in a saprate sheet. please provide me the related resources of al information selected if necessary this work done from my side might help to have extra information or to be edited by you • literature review : obviously, culture and politics are quite assorted from each other but still activated in concert. in order to remain legal system that can structure their economy and support needs of society . therefore, to distinguish the exact meaning of democracy; is sharing public rights within the decision making process by government. not only by direct interact such as elections but also by indirect actions for example elected representative. in contrasts, totalitarianism is a form of political regime in which citizens are unable to share decisions for instance elections implemented by government as policies caused a lack of restrictions in order to control and dominant the public. moreover, there are four different structures of totalitarianism in the world categorised as fallows. first, communist which also denied any sharing by public during decision making process . thus, started to be eliminated worldwide this regime can be found in china., cuba or vietnam . secondly, a theocratic totalitarianism is a political authorization only by group of people - royal families in gulf regions such as saudi arabia, kuwait, u.a.e and qatar based on theocratic law such as islamic law. then, tribal totalitarianism in such regime the leader of the tribe got all power and authorities such system mainly can be found in african countries such as uganda, kenya or zimbabwe finally, the right- wing which is based on control by an individual with all economic freedom by public but denied political freedom ( hill, 2008). therefore, the cause from all differences in countries’ political system is a new economic structure’s the country tried to provide with related methods in order to achieve sustainability & amp; growth under different circumstances. . political regimes can be a sufficient and beneficial key towards economic growth & amp; vice versa. (hill, 2008) this link is helpful for data about saudi and china to support the argument , and for digrams http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3584.htm also the WTO.com is containing information to support the argument