This election year the Neolibertarian Party nominated a candidate for President of the United States. This candidate promoted the Neolibertarian Party Platform, which contains the following planks: (1) The Neolibertarian Party opposes regulations that prohibit freely consenting adults from having homosexual relationships or that prohibit sexual activities between freely consenting adults of the same sex. It is the policy of to promote federal and state regulations that establish equal rights (e.g., property and domestic partnership rights) for homosexual persons as currently enjoyed by heterosexual persons. However, the rights of homosexuals do not extend to marriage, because by definition marriage can exist between only one male and one female person. (2) The Neolibertarian Party opposes regulations that prohibit the pornographic media industry. It is the policy of the party to resist all attempts, through federal or state legislation, to restrict freely consenting adults from financing, performing in, producing, advertising, selling, distributing, and consuming pornographic media. Laws restricting the involvement of minors or the obvious humiliation of persons in these activities are, however, appropriate. For your essay, consider the following moral questions: (1A) Is the Neolibertarian Party''s plank on homosexual rights morally justified? Summarize the arguments of Richard D. Mohr and John Finnis on the subject of homosexuality. Apply those arguments to the Neolibertarian Party''s statement on the subject. Remember to deal with the statement in its entirety. Also state your own, personal moral judgment on this question and your reasons for it. (2A) Is the Neolibertarian Party''s plank on pornography morally justified? Summarize the arguments of Helen E. Longino and Mark R. Wicclair on the subject of pornography. Apply those arguments to the Neolibertarian Party''s statement on the subject. Remember to deal with the statement in its entirety. Also state your own, personal moral judgment on this question and your reasons for it. Below is the rubric I will use for this assignment. After I have completed grading the essays, you will receive an evaluation form with this rubric and the points awarded for each evaluation category. If you would like me to provide some comments specific to your essay, I will be happy to do that upon request. Knowledge of Moral Arguments: Descriptions the arguments provided by Mohr, Finnis, Longino, and Wicclair. Clear application of these general principles to this specific moral question. (40 points) Assessment of Arguments: Descriptions the challenges to these arguments to this specific moral question. (20 points) Original Moral Argument: Clear articulation of a moral position regarding the Neolibertarian Party Platform planks. Explanation of the originality of the position, i.e., in what respects the position is different from those of the authors previously discussed.(30 points) Writing: Essay is well-organized. Thesis is clearly stated at beginning of essay. Spelling and grammar correct. All sources properly cited using standard (e.g., MLA or APA) format. (10 points)