Borrow or rent and view the movie, 12 Angry Men. d) Discuss the questions that appear on this document. e) Summarize your discussion findings in a paper of approximately 250 words. As you view the movie, observe the interactions among the jurors and make notes with regard to the following areas: What is the influence of relevant background factors on each juror’s decision making process? What roles did you observe among each of the jurors? List each juror and identify their roles: Task Roles: Initiator-Contributor, Information Seeker, Information Giver, Coordinator, Orientor, Evaluator, Energizer, Opinion Giver Group-building or Maintenance Roles: Encourager, Harmonizer, Gatekeeper, Follower Self-centered Roles: Aggressor, Blocker, Recognition Seeker, Playboy, Dominator How was the maintenance part of the group process balanced with the task? What was the jury’s task? How did leadership surface? What situational leadership styles (telling, selling, participating, delegating) did you observe? How did leadership match follower readiness? Who used the various types of power and influence (reward, coercive, legitimate, referent and expert), and how was this demonstrated? Did any character stay stuck in a particular way of using power? If so, who? What jurors employed a variety of power/influence strategies? How was this demonstrated? What decision-making process(es) emerged during the deliberations? What types of conflict emerged? What conflict styles (competing, avoiding, accommodating, compromising, and collaborating) did you observe? What would you report about the jurors’ group process?